The broader issue concerns the cultural encounter between media
from civil societies and media from societies that still play
be pre-modern rules, or what we are calling prime divider societies.
Here we suggest that without understanding some basic attitudinal
and emotional orientations of these two kinds of culture, one
cannot navigate the culture clash in the midst of which, whether
we like it or not, we now find ourselves. Some of these entries
introduce significantly different definitions from current usage
(civil society, anti-Semitism, game theory),
some new terminology (demopath, prime divider),
some merely lay out the issues (Islamophobia, moral
equivalence, self-criticism). In all cases we invite
further comment, further links to valuable and/or illustrative
articles, criticism as well as concord.
In every case we have tried not to step on too many of the toes
of political correctness. There is a real decency to some political
correctness that should be honored. Just because we allow people
to say anything, hardly means that we have to approve it. But
we have found that we cannot escape setting off some politically
correct land-mines, partly because it has been a rigid and misguided
application of some politically correct principles that has created
our current dilemma. We count on your reading to be fair and impartial,
not prejudiced by “politically correct” radar.
We invite you to visit these various pages in whatever order
and speed you’d like. We think that they will help inform the
conversation we hope takes place at the pages of MEDIA:
REFORM